India's gig and platform economy has witnessed explosive growth over the last decade. With the rapid expansion of app-based services spanning ride-hailing, food delivery, beauty, and wellness services, a new demographic of workforce has emerged. Notably, there has been a significant influx of female workers into this sector, drawn by the promise of flexible hours and independent earnings. Platforms like Urban Company, Swiggy, Zomato, and various domestic service apps have become primary sources of livelihood for millions of women across the country.
However, the flexible nature of gig work comes at a steep cost: the absence of standard employment benefits. For years, female gig workers operated in a legal gray area, classified merely as "independent contractors" or "partners," which deliberately excluded them from statutory social security nets, most crucially, maternity benefits.
The introduction of the Code on Social Security, 2020, marks a watershed moment in Indian labor jurisprudence, aiming to rectify this disparity by formally recognizing gig and platform workers and extending essential social security measures to them.
The Code on Social Security (2020): A Paradigm Shift
Historically, Indian labor laws were rigidly designed around a traditional "employer-employee" relationship. If you didn't have a formalized employment contract, you were largely invisible to the state's labor protections. The Code on Social Security, 2020 changes this narrative fundamentally.
"The Code on Social Security, 2020 is a progressive piece of legislation that, for the first time in Indian legal history, defines 'gig workers' and 'platform workers,' acknowledging their contribution to the economy and their inherent right to a basic social security net."
Under the Code:
- Gig Worker is defined as a person who performs work or participates in a work arrangement and earns from such activities outside of traditional employer-employee relationships.
- Platform Worker is defined as someone engaged in a work arrangement outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship in which organizations or individuals use an online platform to access other organizations or individuals to solve specific problems or to provide specific services.
This clear legal recognition paves the way for female gig workers to claim their rightful maternity benefits, ensuring that pregnancy and childbirth do not lead to financial ruin or a complete loss of livelihood.
Traditional Maternity Benefit Act vs. Code on Social Security (2020)
To truly appreciate the impact of the Code, we must compare it with the traditional framework provided by the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The older Act, while robust for formal sector employees, categorically failed the modern gig worker.
| Feature | Traditional Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 | Code on Social Security, 2020 (For Gig Workers) |
|---|---|---|
| Applicability | Requires a strict employer-employee relationship. | Applies to gig and platform workers without traditional employment contracts. |
| Eligibility Criteria | Must have worked in the establishment for at least 80 days in the 12 months immediately preceding the date of expected delivery. | Criteria to be defined under specific schemes formulated by the Central Government tailored to the gig model. |
| Nature of Benefit | Direct liability of the employer to pay paid leave (26 weeks) and medical bonus. | Financed through a dedicated Social Security Fund, moving the direct burden away from individual aggregators while still holding them accountable for contributions. |
| Job Security | Explicit protections against dismissal during maternity leave. | Schemes aim to provide income security, but structural protections regarding "deactivation" from platforms require stronger regulatory oversight. |
The fundamental difference lies in the shift from an employer-liability model to a state-administered fund model. Because platforms argue they do not "employ" these workers, imposing direct employer liability was legally contentious. The Code creatively bypasses this hurdle by instituting a centralized funding mechanism.
Specific Provisions for Maternity Benefits
Section 109 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 explicitly empowers the Central Government and State Governments to frame suitable social security schemes for unorganized workers, gig workers, and platform workers.
Specifically, the Central Government is mandated to frame schemes concerning:
- Life and disability cover
- Accident insurance
- Health and maternity benefits
- Old age protection
- Creche facilities
For female gig workers, the inclusion of "Health and maternity benefits" is critical. While the exact quantum of paid leave (whether it aligns with the 26 weeks of the formal sector) and the specific payout mechanisms are detailed in the rules and schemes rather than the primary Code, the statutory entitlement is firmly established.
These schemes are expected to provide cash transfers during the period of maternity, covering both prenatal and postnatal care, thereby mitigating the severe income shock that women face when they are physically unable to take on gigs.
Financing the Benefits: The Social Security Fund
The most innovative, yet heavily debated, aspect of the Code is how it intends to fund these massive social security programs. Recognizing that a traditional provident fund or state insurance model wouldn't seamlessly apply, the Code establishes a dedicated Social Security Fund specifically for gig and platform workers.
How is the Fund Financed?
The financing mechanism is a hybrid model involving contributions from aggregators (the digital platforms) and the government:
- Aggregator Contributions: Digital aggregators (like ride-sharing apps, food delivery platforms, and home service providers) are legally obligated to contribute a percentage of their annual turnover to this fund.
- The Cap: The contribution is set at 1% to 2% of the aggregator's annual turnover.
- The Ceiling: To ensure that platforms are not unduly burdened in a way that stifles business, there is a ceiling—the contribution cannot exceed 5% of the total amount payable or paid to gig and platform workers by the aggregator.
- Government Grants: The Central and State Governments may also infuse funds through grants and budgetary allocations.
"By mandating a turnover-based contribution from aggregators, the State is attempting to socialize the cost of maternity benefits, ensuring that platforms internalize the true cost of their workforce's well-being."
Challenges and the Road Ahead
While the Code on Social Security, 2020 is a monumental legislative achievement on paper, its real-world implementation faces substantial hurdles:
- The e-Shram Portal Registration: For any gig worker to avail of these benefits, they must be registered on the government's e-Shram portal. Many female gig workers, especially those with lower digital literacy, find the registration process cumbersome or are entirely unaware of its necessity.
- Algorithmic Management and "Firing": Unlike formal employment where a pregnant woman cannot be fired, gig workers are managed by algorithms. If a pregnant worker declines gigs or logs out for an extended period, the algorithm may lower her ratings or permanently deactivate her account. The law must evolve to protect against algorithmic penalization during maternity.
- Delays in Scheme Formulation: The Code was passed in 2020, but the actual rollout of targeted, well-funded schemes has been slow, leaving many workers in continued precariousness.
- Defining the Baseline: The exact monetary value of the maternity benefit needs to be substantial enough to cover living costs, replacing the actual lost income rather than just being a token nominal amount.
Conclusion
The inclusion of maternity benefits for female gig and platform workers under the Code on Social Security, 2020 is not merely a labor reform; it is a vital step toward gender justice in the modern economy. By recognizing the dignity of platform labor and instituting the Social Security Fund, India has set a global precedent.
However, legislation is only the first step. The true test lies in the rapid formulation of these schemes, ensuring seamless platform integration for funding, and guaranteeing that a female delivery partner or beauty service provider can take the time off she needs for childbirth without the looming terror of destitution. The future of India's digital economy must be built on the foundation of equitable social protection for all its workers.

Rahul Kumar
Founder and Lead Researcher
Independent software developer and labour-policy researcher. After working between India and the UAE, Rahul built GratuityCalc to make end-of-service and gratuity rules easier to understand and check against primary sources.
View profile